A lot has been manufactured from Jalen Hurts’ responses to 2 questions on Nick Sirianni greater than per week in the past now.
In all probability an excessive amount of.
Had this change occurred, say, throughout a sport week … and even earlier within the offseason exercise program … it may not be getting as a lot consideration as it’s proper now when there simply isn’t a lot else happening news-wise.
That being stated, a couple of factor might be true. Hurts’ feedback may not be well worth the full extent of consideration they’ve been producing, no less than domestically. However the responses will also be greater than a complete non-issue.
On the latter level, take a look at the next part from Jeff McLane’s newest “unCovering the Birds” podcast for the Inquirer (daring emphasis is mine):
“It was, for sure, an ungainly change. Hurts was given the chance to say one thing constructive about his coach … and ended up not saying a lot in any respect. Perhaps he misunderstood the query? I don’t wish to make an excessive amount of of the second.
But when Hurts has proven something throughout his time in Philadelphia, it’s that he’s intentional in nearly every part he does.
Based on crew sources, his dealing with of this query about Sirianni proper earlier than the Eagles parted earlier than the summer time disillusioned a number of key figures inside the group.”
So, it’s not identical to individuals are attempting to make one thing out of a complete nothing-burger right here. Apparently there’s a sentiment inside the crew that Hurts may’ve dealt with this example higher than he did.
