Ollie Lawrence needs to be applauded for streetwise play – rugby should ditch holier-than-thou picture | Rugby union

A spherical of applause for Ollie Lawrence. Not for his apology after Bathtub’s last-gasp defeat by Northampton, which was fully pointless, however for having the wherewithal to place his facet right into a profitable place by demonstrating a streetwise streak all too seldom proven in elite rugby union.

To recap, Lawrence was pilloried by Northampton supporters for taking place in instalments after a reasonably innocuous conflict of heads with Alex Mitchell in the previous few minutes of Saints’ thrilling 35-34 win over Bathtub on Sunday. He took himself right down to his knees, clutched his face and in doing so, made certain that the match was stopped, the incident reviewed.

Upon evaluate, the referee Anthony Woodthorpe – who loved a wonderful match within the center – decided that Mitchell was too excessive in his tried deal with and the England scrum-half was proven a yellow card. Bathtub have been awarded a penalty, Finn Russell kicked it and it could have given the league leaders victory had Fin Smith not responded in form from the tee within the dying throes.

Lawrence was evidently fired up all through the match – it was his late deal with on George Hendy that compelled the Northampton full-back off the pitch simply earlier than half-time – and after he was caught smiling on digicam, having simply received the aforementioned penalty, he additional provoked the ire of Saints supporters. On Sunday evening he took to social media and wrote: “Apologies if my actions right now offended anybody. On evaluate, I perceive the frustration voiced! I’ll be higher.”

No want. Put merely, Lawrence realised that he had been the sufferer of foul play and ensured it was dropped at the officers’ consideration. In doing so, he allowed his facet to retake the lead. As Northampton’s director of rugby, Phil Dowson, conceded afterwards: “The one who issues had a whistle and Anthony Woodthorpe mentioned it was head-on-head. We’ve seen just a few angles of it. We need to take away that concussion hazard out of the sport. It regarded fairly innocuous however the referee gave that call and due to this fact it stands.”

In the end it have to be thought-about sensible, clear-eyed pondering by Lawrence, within the closing phases of a match, with the stress at its highest. An act that needs to be lauded. Given England’s propensity for confusion within the closing quarters of matches of late, you want to suppose Steve Borthwick can have been impressed by the centre’s actions.

The naysayers will level to rugby values – a nebulous notion that may at occasions maintain the game again. Rugby, as we’re so typically instructed, is at its coronary heart a easy sport of collisions. Win the achieve line and most of the time you’ll win the match. Nonetheless, additionally it is a sport with a weighty, complicated and ever-changing regulation ebook. On the elite finish it’s typically a sport primarily based on the manipulation and exploitation of these legal guidelines. This weekend the Champions and Problem Cups undertake 4 new regulation trials and you may put the mortgage on armies of analysts poring over the high-quality print to seek out loopholes and methods during which they are often exploited.

Furthermore, rugby is a sport during which dishonest is widely known. It’s typically repackaged as “the darkish arts” and it has turn out to be a drained trope that Richie McCaw made a profession out of it however it’s hypocritical to laud a entrance row for illegally gaining the higher hand at scrum one minute, then chastise Lawrence for his actions the subsequent.

Additionally it is unrealistic, in an age during which contact with the pinnacle is so rigorously policed, during which it’s the gamers who bear the brunt within the type of yellow and purple playing cards for such marginal transgressions, to count on that they won’t manipulate or exploit these legal guidelines. They’re each human beings and elite skilled sportspeople and the one shock is that it doesn’t occur extra typically. For lawmakers to suppose it won’t occur on the flawed foundation that rugby gamers are higher than that’s naive within the excessive. Certainly, the concept penalties shouldn’t be milked on the premise of novice beliefs is anachronistic.

There will probably be those that froth on the very thought. Who will say that anybody using the identical strategy as Lawrence when turning out for his or her grassroots membership on a Saturday afternoon will now not be welcome. Superb. A lot in the identical manner that any novice footballer taking place too simply within the penalty space on a Sunday morning can count on some tough justice the subsequent time they obtain the ball, a Lawrence copycat could also be suggested to keep away from discovering themselves on the backside of a ruck for some time. However rugby at novice stage is a distinct sport fully to the skilled sport, performed below completely different legal guidelines. The 2 usually are not comparable.

The counterargument additionally warns of a sport performed by gents blah blah blah going the best way of soccer. It’s holier-than-thou garbage that afflicts rugby. Soccer is a multibillion pound trade whereas three Premiership golf equipment have gone to the wall in recent times. Soccer stopped clinging to its Corinthian spirit way back and is in a far stronger place for it. On the elite finish, rugby would do effectively to ditch the self-righteousness, to go away novice beliefs up to now and embrace professionalism, warts and all.

What of the smirk that got here throughout Lawrence’s face that appears to have riled so many? Once more, we are sometimes instructed that rugby wants extra characters, that gamers want to point out extra persona to assist develop the game. Properly, Lawrence, no matter his apology, can count on a fierce welcome the subsequent time he runs out at Franklin’s Gardens. He’ll play the position of villain whether or not he likes it or not and it’ll solely add to the sense of theatre. What’s to not like about that?