For the second consecutive 12 months, Matt Chapman stands as one of many prime impending free agent hitters. Except he suffers a big damage within the subsequent few weeks, he’s all however assured to opt-out of the ultimate two years and $36MM on his take care of the Giants.
Jon Heyman of the New York Publish reported a pair weeks in the past that San Francisco was hopeful of retaining the star third baseman on a brand new multi-year deal. Agent Scott Boras confirmed as a lot to Susan Slusser of the San Francisco Chronicle, telling her that the edges have had some discussions. President of baseball operations Farhan Zaidi framed issues equally, telling Slusser the events have “had conversations” and “lively dialogue” on a long-term association.
That’s relatively imprecise terminology that actually doesn’t counsel something is imminent. It’s nonetheless affirmation there’s some quantity of mutual curiosity in preserving Chapman in San Francisco. He’s a California native who has a longstanding relationship with skipper Bob Melvin relationship again to their time in Oakland.
Chapman hasn’t had any downside acclimating to Oracle Park. He takes a .245/.335/.442 batting line and his typically robust defensive grades into tonight’s sport in Seattle. He’s at 20+ homers for the fifth time in his profession with a powerful 11% stroll proportion. Chapman’s 24.3% strikeout price is a bit greater than the league mark however could be his lowest price since 2019. It’s superb all-around manufacturing regardless of a gradual begin. Chapman limped to a .266 on-base proportion via the tip of April. He has been probably the most productive infielders within the majors since then, posting a .253/.355/.461 line with 16 homers relationship again to Might 1.
It’s the inverse sample to Chapman’s 2023 marketing campaign. He was arguably the most effective participant within the majors via the season’s first month final 12 months. His offensive numbers plummeted after that and he hit the market with one thing of a down-arrow trajectory. Chapman had a straightforward name to say no a qualifying supply from the Blue Jays, however he and his camp on the Boras Company didn’t discover the cash they had been searching for. It wasn’t till the start of March that he inked a $54MM assure with a number of opt-outs.
Between a signing bonus, his wage, and a buyout (assuming he opts out), Chapman is making $20MM this 12 months. That’s about what he’d have made if he’d taken the QO from Toronto — though the additional two years current extra long-term safety than the qualifying supply would have offered.
Chapman will presumably attempt once more to land a deal that pushes into 9 figures. He’ll play nearly all of subsequent season at age 32. It’s tough however not unimaginable to drag a $100MM+ deal at that age. As proven on MLBTR’s Contract Tracker, there have been 4 nine-figure offers throughout the final decade for hitters who had been 32 or older. Freddie Freeman’s six-year, $162MM pact led the best way amongst free agent contracts. Jose Altuve, Paul Goldschmidt and Manny Machado signed extensions ranging between $125MM and $170MM in new cash on five-year phrases.
These gamers had been all higher hitters than Chapman has been. As a plus defender at third base, he supplies extra worth on that facet of the ball than all of them, other than perhaps Machado. Groups may very well be cautious about paying for protection right into a participant’s mid-30s.
A five-year time period for Chapman would run via his age-36 season. That’s the purpose via which Kris Bryant and Anthony Rendon had been paid on seven-year contracts (each of which have been disasters for the workforce). Chapman actually isn’t going to strategy Rendon’s $35MM annual wage. Bryant’s $26MM AAV is a extra lifelike goal, albeit on a what’d doubtless be a four- or five-year time period as a substitute of seven.
Josh Donaldson and DJ LeMahieu every signed via age-37 as free agent third basemen. Each ensures checked in simply south of $100MM. These contracts are a number of years outdated and had been each signed after the participant declined a qualifying supply, thereby attaching draft compensation. The Giants can’t make Chapman a QO — the CBA prevents a participant from receiving a couple of in his profession — so he’d hit the market solely unencumbered. Barring some form of hometown low cost, Chapman presumably wouldn’t be excited by forgoing a free agent journey for lower than the Donaldson and LeMahieu ensures.
Alex Bregman leads the approaching free agent class at third base. Chapman is the clear #2 possibility and the category drops off dramatically from there. Final winter’s group was even shallower. Assuming one considers Cody Bellinger primarily an outfielder relatively than a primary baseman, Chapman’s $54MM assure led all infielders.
As Slusser observes, a Chapman extension might should be San Francisco’s greatest funding below this entrance workplace. The Giants have solely signed one nine-figure deal since they employed Farhan Zaidi as president of baseball operations in the course of the 2018-19 offseason: final winter’s six-year, $113MM pact for 25-year-old middle fielder Jung Hoo Lee. They’ve taken loads of larger swings and had been a failed bodily away from signing Carlos Correa for $350MM, however they’ve but to truly land a home free agent on a long-term deal. They’ve been far more amenable to shorter-term pickups with opt-outs for gamers whose markets didn’t develop as they’d hoped (e.g. Carlos Rodón, Michael Conforto, Blake Snell, Chapman).
The Giants have round $132MM in assured cash for subsequent season. Anticipated opt-outs for Snell and Chapman would knock that right down to roughly $85MM. Lee, Logan Webb, Robbie Ray (assuming he doesn’t decide out this 12 months) and Jordan Hicks are the one gamers signed past subsequent 12 months. That doesn’t embrace arbitration projections for Mike Yastrzemski, Thairo Estrada, Tyler Rogers, LaMonte Wade Jr. and Camilo Doval. Estrada and Yastrzemski are potential commerce or non-tender candidates. The Giants ought to have a very good quantity of payroll flexibility even when they maintain everybody from their arbitration group.
